<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 14 Things that Microsoft Needs to Do with Windows 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pctipsbox.com/14-things-that-microsoft-needs-to-do-with-windows-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pctipsbox.com/14-things-that-microsoft-needs-to-do-with-windows-7/</link>
	<description>Tips Tricks Central</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:24:14 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liviu</title>
		<link>http://www.pctipsbox.com/14-things-that-microsoft-needs-to-do-with-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-12738</link>
		<dc:creator>Liviu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pctipsbox.com/?p=1623#comment-12738</guid>
		<description>win7? lacking driver support is as bad as in vista... it succesfully recognises a satellite card as audio device!
running xp and win7 on the same machine, mostly same apps... (and NOT web browsing and emailing is the criteria! for fast response)
still xp seems to be better; some people want speed- but running 5000000 unnecessary services (or microsoft-dedicated) bloats win7 as much as did in vista; it might be faster but I guess when you compare it to a snail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>win7? lacking driver support is as bad as in vista&#8230; it succesfully recognises a satellite card as audio device!<br />
running xp and win7 on the same machine, mostly same apps&#8230; (and NOT web browsing and emailing is the criteria! for fast response)<br />
still xp seems to be better; some people want speed- but running 5000000 unnecessary services (or microsoft-dedicated) bloats win7 as much as did in vista; it might be faster but I guess when you compare it to a snail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTF!</title>
		<link>http://www.pctipsbox.com/14-things-that-microsoft-needs-to-do-with-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-12063</link>
		<dc:creator>WTF!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pctipsbox.com/?p=1623#comment-12063</guid>
		<description>WTF is wrong with Mac OSX? Seems like you hate them, yet it is evidently better then Windows. (Microsoft after all did rip ideas off of Apple)

I&#039;ll be betting that windows 7 will just be as sh*t as Vista. Stupid Driver support and backwards compatibility not working!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF is wrong with Mac OSX? Seems like you hate them, yet it is evidently better then Windows. (Microsoft after all did rip ideas off of Apple)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be betting that windows 7 will just be as sh*t as Vista. Stupid Driver support and backwards compatibility not working!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
