Extra RAM Isn’t a Waste in Vista

Topics Hardware, Windows Vista on May 4th, 2007

The issue with either XP or 32-bit Vista really isn’t the OS itself, but the of the old IBM PC. The reserves a certain amount of for -mapped I/O. Still, even Win XP could “see” well over 3GB of RAM. It and 32-bit Vista do support something known as (physical address extension), which allows applications written for to use more than 2GB of .

However, Vista itself likes having more than 2GB of RAM. The reason is SuperFetch, the caching technology built into Vista. SuperFetch will happily use excess to help speed up disk access by keeping frequently used data cached in . So having more than 2GB is of greater in Vista than in Win XP.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Furl
  • Live
  • MisterWong.DE
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • BlinkList
  • DotNetKicks
  • Fark
  • Netvouz
  • Spurl
  • MisterWong
  • Webnews.de
  • e-mail

Tags:, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

2 Responses to “Extra RAM Isn’t a Waste in Vista”

  1. Comment by XtraSalafy

    Extra RAM Isn’t a Waste in VistaDual-Booting Win XP and Vista Vista Tip: Compatibility Files Tidy Up Your Places in Four Steps Type Better With TypeFaster

  2. Comment by StumbleUpon - Your page is now on StumbleUpon!

    [...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]

Leave a Reply