<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista to Windows 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pctipsbox.com/vista-to-windows-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pctipsbox.com/vista-to-windows-7/</link>
	<description>Tips Tricks Central</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:24:14 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 All Day Upgrade &#124; PC Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.pctipsbox.com/vista-to-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-14341</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 All Day Upgrade &#124; PC Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pctipsbox.com/?p=3172#comment-14341</guid>
		<description>[...] and RTM releases have been mostly very positive, however, the one thing we haven’t tried yet is a Vista to Win7 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and RTM releases have been mostly very positive, however, the one thing we haven’t tried yet is a Vista to Win7 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 Upgrade Performance &#124; PC Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.pctipsbox.com/vista-to-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-14236</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 Upgrade Performance &#124; PC Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pctipsbox.com/?p=3172#comment-14236</guid>
		<description>[...] compared to Vista and an upgrade from Windows XP -&gt; Vista would not be a good comparison with Vista -&gt; Windows 7. Windows XP did not support 64-bit upgrades and we wanted to track 64-bit upgrade performance as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] compared to Vista and an upgrade from Windows XP -&gt; Vista would not be a good comparison with Vista -&gt; Windows 7. Windows XP did not support 64-bit upgrades and we wanted to track 64-bit upgrade performance as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 Free Upgrade Option Program &#124; PC Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.pctipsbox.com/vista-to-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-13546</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 Free Upgrade Option Program &#124; PC Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pctipsbox.com/?p=3172#comment-13546</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows Vista Home Basic, Windows Vista Starter Edition and all the editions of¦Windows [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows Vista Home Basic, Windows Vista Starter Edition and all the editions of¦Windows [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
